Fast scanEvidence-backedComparable over time

Score framework

How scores are calculated

Growth Score looks forward. Quarterly Score measures execution. Read them as two separate lenses inside the same research workflow.

Score models

2

Forward outlook and execution read

Scale

0-10

Comparable across companies and time

Read order

Growth → Quarterly

Start with outlook, then check delivery

Growth score model

How the Growth Score is built

Growth Score is a weighted blend of business catalysts, scenario outcomes, guidance quality, execution confidence, and market context. The output is a comparable 0-10 score for forward outlook.

Catalyst Strength (30%)

Higher-conviction business catalysts lift the score when they are concrete, near-term, and commercially meaningful.

Scenario Strength (25%)

Base, Upside, and Downside cases are read together to assess expected growth range and balance of outcomes.

Guidance Strength (15%)

Clear, quantified guidance and execution milestones increase confidence in the forward growth path.

Execution Confidence (15%)

Feasibility, adoption readiness, unit economics, and timing quality indicate how investable the growth plan is.

Management Sentiment (10%, when available)

Recent management tone and commentary can reinforce or soften the growth view.

Industry Context (5%, when available)

Sector tailwinds, headwinds, and cycle position provide context for how much of growth is structural versus cyclical.

How scenarios are read

  • Base, Upside, and Downside are interpreted together, not in isolation.
  • Confidence quality influences how much conviction the scenario set deserves.
  • More durable drivers support higher conviction, while visible risks pull confidence lower.
  • The model applies directional stress so upside and downside are not treated as equal-quality paths.

What gets returned

Base case growth viewUpside case potentialDownside risk caseFinal Growth Score (0-10)Score rationaleStep-by-step breakdown

Score bands

Exceptional

≥ 8.5

Top-conviction outlook: strong base, well-supported scenarios, durable catalysts.

Strong

8.0 – 8.4

Solid base growth and supportive scenarios; visible execution path.

Solid

7.5 – 7.9

Clearly positive outlook with reasonable conviction; some moving parts to monitor.

Moderate

7.0 – 7.4

Mixed conviction or lower base growth; needs further evidence to firm up.

Soft

6.5 – 6.9

Weak conviction or downside-heavy scenarios; growth is unclear.

Weak

< 6.5

Material concerns on growth visibility or execution.

Coverage distribution

105 companies

Exceptional
4(4%)
Strong
36(34%)
Solid
51(49%)
Moderate
11(10%)
Soft
3(3%)
Weak
0(0%)

Current coverage universe — how the cohort actually distributes across these bands today.

How to read this score

Base 18%, Upside 26%, Downside 10%, Growth score 8.4

  • What supports this: strong catalyst pipeline and clearer execution milestones.
  • What could pull it lower: weaker adoption pace or demand volatility in key segments.

If some optional context inputs are unavailable, the score still computes from available components and stays on the same 0-10 scale.

Read Growth first, then Quarterly. Both models stay on the same 0-10 scale but answer different questions.

View LeaderboardsBack to Home